Gardner v. Budnik et al
ORDER if Plaintiff wishes to amend his complaint, he may complete the new complaint form in its entirety in accordance with this order, mark it as "Amended Complaint," and file within 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/28/2016. (lej)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
WALLACE A. GARDNER, ADC # 110784
CHRISTOPHER BUDNIK, Deputy Warden,
Varner Unit; et al.
Wallace A. Gardner (“Plaintiff”) filed this action pro se and pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section
1983. (Doc. No. 2.) He also filed an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and
Affidavit (“Application”) (Doc. No. 1). Plaintiff is a “three-striker” within the meaning of the Prison
Litigation Reform Act.1 However, he may be eligible to proceed in this action if he is in imminent
danger of physical harm. See Martin v. Shelton, 319 F.3d 1048, 1050 (8th Cir. 2003); Ashley v.
Dilworth, 147 F.3d 715, 717 (8th Cir. 1998). Before proceeding further, I invite Plaintiff to amend
his Complaint in order to clarify several issues.
Plaintiff alleges he was placed in a recently painted cell and the paint fumes caused him
dizziness, headaches, and asthma attacks. (Doc. No. 2 at 4.) He alleges this occurred in October
2015, but he has not specified whether he is still subject to these conditions. (Id.) Additionally,
Plaintiff has named eight Defendants to this action, but he has not specified how any of these
individuals was responsible for violating his rights. Rather, he asks that a trial be held to determine
which Defendants were at fault. (Id.) In so doing, he has placed the cart before the horse. Plaintiff
must specifically allege at the outset of this action which Defendants violated his rights and how they
See Gardner v. Kelley, et al., 5:15CV00223-SWW; Gardner v. Hutchison et al.,
4:15CV00650-JLH; and Gardner v. Fox et al., 4:14CV00197-JM.
Plaintiff, if he chooses, may submit to the Court, within thirty (30) days of the entry date of
this Order, a superseding Amended Complaint which complies with this Order and contains all of
his claims against all defendants he is suing in a single document. Plaintiff is cautioned that an
Amended Complaint renders his original Complaint without legal effect. Only claims properly set
out in the Amended Complaint will be allowed to proceed. If he fails to file an Amended Complaint,
I will screen his allegations as they stand and some or all of his claims may be dismissed.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint
form to Plaintiff with this Order. If Plaintiff wishes to amend his Complaint, he may complete the
new complaint form in its entirety in accordance with this Order, mark it as “Amended Complaint,”
and file within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.
DATED this 28th day of January, 2016.
JOE J. VOLPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?