Ruth v. McGee et al
ORDER that Plaintiff should provide a viable address at which service for Defendant Tate may be attempted within 30 days of this order's entry. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 4/13/2016. (lej)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ERWIN RUTH, ADC #135534
STAN MCGEE, Sheriff,
Dallas County Sheriff’s Office; et al.
On March 24, 2016, I ordered service for, among others, Defendant Tate. (Doc. No. 8.)
Summons for this Defendant was returned unexecuted. (Doc. No. 15.) If Plaintiff’s claims against
Defendant Tate are to proceed, he must provide a viable address for him within thirty (30) days of
this Order’s entry. See Lee v. Armontrout, 991 F.2d 487, 489 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (holding
that it is a pro se plaintiff’s responsibility to provide proper addresses for defendants).
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Plaintiff should provide a viable address at which
service for Defendant Tate may be attempted within thirty (30) days of this Order’s entry. If he fails
to do so, I will recommend Tate’s dismissal without prejudice.
So Ordered this 13th day of April, 2016.
JOE J. VOLPE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?