Davis et al v. Kelly et al

Filing 97

ORDER Adopting 95 Recommended Disposition. Plaintiff Carl Davis's 50 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied and defendants' 73 and 83 Motions for Summary Judgment are granted. Davis's inadequate medical care and retaliation claims against defendants Kelley, Griffin, King, Clowers, Watson, Taylor, Williams, and Gray are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/18/2017. (mcz)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CARL DAVIS, JR.
ADC #80431
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 5:16CV00039 BSM

WENDY KELLEY, Director,
Arkansas Department of Correction, et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
The recommended disposition (“RD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge
J. Thomas Ray [Doc. No. 95] and plaintiff Carl Davis’s objections [Doc. No. 96] have been
reviewed. After a review of the record, the RD is adopted.
Accordingly, Davis’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 50] is denied and
defendants’ motions for summary judgment [Doc. Nos. 73, 83] are granted. Davis’s
inadequate medical care and retaliation claims against defendants Kelley, Griffin, King,
Clowers, Watson, Taylor, Williams, and Gray are dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of August 2017.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE