Davis et al v. Kelly et al
ORDER Adopting 95 Recommended Disposition. Plaintiff Carl Davis's 50 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied and defendants' 73 and 83 Motions for Summary Judgment are granted. Davis's inadequate medical care and retaliation claims against defendants Kelley, Griffin, King, Clowers, Watson, Taylor, Williams, and Gray are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 8/18/2017. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CARL DAVIS, JR.
CASE NO. 5:16CV00039 BSM
WENDY KELLEY, Director,
Arkansas Department of Correction, et al.
The recommended disposition (“RD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge
J. Thomas Ray [Doc. No. 95] and plaintiff Carl Davis’s objections [Doc. No. 96] have been
reviewed. After a review of the record, the RD is adopted.
Accordingly, Davis’s motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 50] is denied and
defendants’ motions for summary judgment [Doc. Nos. 73, 83] are granted. Davis’s
inadequate medical care and retaliation claims against defendants Kelley, Griffin, King,
Clowers, Watson, Taylor, Williams, and Gray are dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of August 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?