Doyle v. Fread et al

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING 11 Partial Recommended Disposition. Mr. Doyle's access-to-court claims against Defendants Pitts and Clark are DISMISSED, without prejudice. The claims regarding failure to process grievances against Defendants Fread, Pitts, a nd Clark are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Defendants Pitts and Clark are DISMISSED from this lawsuit. Mr. Doyle's deliberate-indifference claim and an access-to-courts claim against Defendant Fread may PROCEED. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 3/28/2016. (mcz)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
GILBERT MICHAEL DOYLE,
ADC # 98722
V.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00054 JM/BD

ROBBIE FREAD, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received a Partial Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”)
filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation, the
timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the
Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings
in all respects.
Mr. Doyle’s access-to-court claims against Defendants Pitts and Clark are
DISMISSED, without prejudice. The claims regarding failure to process grievances
against Defendants Fread, Pitts, and Clark are DISMISSED, with prejudice. Defendants
Pitts and Clark are DISMISSED from this lawsuit. Mr. Doyle’s deliberate-indifference
claim and an access-to-courts claim against Defendant Fread may PROCEED.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 28th day of March, 2016.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE