Huddleston v. Esaw et al

Filing 40

ORDER approving and adopting 22 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; directing the Clerk of Court to alter the docket to reflect that Defendant "Jordan" is appropriately Defendant &q uot;Wilson"; and dismissing without prejudice defendants Jada Lawrence and Rory Griffin for failure to state any claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/25/2016. (ljb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ROCKY HUDDLESTON, ADC # 652500
v.

PLAINTIFF

No. 5:16CV00059-JLH-JJV

PHILLIP ESAW, Lieutenant, Arkansas
Department of Correction; et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all
respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.

The Clerk of Court alter the docket to reflect that Defendant “Jordan” is

appropriately Defendant “Wilson.”
2.

Defendants Jada Lawrence and Rory Griffin are DISMISSED without prejudice for

Plaintiff’s failure to state any claim upon which relief may be granted.
3.

The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis

appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this 25th day of April, 2016.

_________________________________
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE