Huddleston v. Esaw et al
ORDER approving and adopting 22 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; directing the Clerk of Court to alter the docket to reflect that Defendant "Jordan" is appropriately Defendant &q uot;Wilson"; and dismissing without prejudice defendants Jada Lawrence and Rory Griffin for failure to state any claim upon which relief may be granted. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/25/2016. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ROCKY HUDDLESTON, ADC # 652500
PHILLIP ESAW, Lieutenant, Arkansas
Department of Correction; et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
The Clerk of Court alter the docket to reflect that Defendant “Jordan” is
appropriately Defendant “Wilson.”
Defendants Jada Lawrence and Rory Griffin are DISMISSED without prejudice for
Plaintiff’s failure to state any claim upon which relief may be granted.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
SO ORDERED this 25th day of April, 2016.
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?