Thurman v. Bynum et al
ORDER approving and adopting 5 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing 1 Thurman's complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief m ay be granted; finding that this dismissal counts as a strike; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 05/11/2016. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
NO. 5:16CV00080 JLH
CHARLES BYNUM, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should
be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:
Thurman’s complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state
a claim upon which relief may be granted.
This dismissal counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and
judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 11th day of May, 2016.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?