Martin v. Steve et al

Filing 41

ORDER adopting the 40 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; and granting in part and denying in part the 32 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Stieve and Powell. As to Defendant Stieve, the motion is deni ed in part. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Stieve were exhausted as to the time period of June 2015 through 1/9/2016. As to Defendant Powell, the motion is granted in part. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Powell are limited to his allegations of denial of pain medication on 8/6/2014, and from 8/24/2014 through 9/7/2014. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/30/2016. (ljb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
EDWIN MARTIN, ADC #152137
v.

PLAINTIFF

No. 5:16CV00084-JLH-JTK

JEFFREY STIEVE, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. There have been no objections. After a review of those
proposed findings and recommendations, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.

The Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Stieve and Powell

is DENIED in part as to Defendant Stieve. Document #32. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant
Stieve were exhausted as to the time period of June 2015, through January 9, 2016.
2.

The Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Stieve and Powell

is GRANTED in part, as to Defendant Powell. Document #32. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant
Powell are limited to his allegations of denial of pain medication on August 6, 2014, and from
August 24, 2014, through September 7, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 30th day of September, 2016.

_________________________________
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE