Baker v. Peyton et al
ORDER ADOPTING 11 Partial Recommended Disposition. Mr. Baker's deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Dan Peyton, Amanda Watts, Laura Morgan, Davis and Griswold for inadequate medical treatment he received at the Cummins Unit may PROCEED. Mr. Baker's claims against David James, Powell, Timothy Trantham and Gofferd are DISMISSED, without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 6/20/2016. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ADC # 550939
CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00101 JM/BD
DANA PEYTON, et al.
The Court has received and reviewed a Partial Recommended Disposition
(“Recommendation”) filed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of Mr.
Baker’s timely objections and a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the
Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings
in all respects.
Mr. Baker’s deliberate-indifference claims against Defendants Dan Peyton,
Amanda Watts, Laura Morgan, Davis and Griswold for inadequate medical treatment he
received at the Cummins Unit may PROCEED.
Mr. Baker’s claims against David James, Powell, Timothy Trantham, and Gofferd
are DISMISSED, without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 20th day of June, 2016.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?