Dunahue v. Bolden et al

Filing 119

ORDER Adopting 117 Report and Recommendations. Defendants' 102 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Therefore, having disposed of all claims against all defendants, this case is closed. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/31/2017. (mcz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION REGINALD DUNAHUE ADC #106911 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00105 BSM KENNIE BOLDEN, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The recommended disposition (“RD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray [Doc. No. 117] has been reviewed. Although plaintiff Reginald Dunahue titled his response as an “objection,” his filing takes no issue with Judge Ray’s findings of fact or conclusions of law, but merely characterizes Judge Ray’s recommendation as “slanderous, malicious and . . . prejudicial.” Doc. No. 118. Nevertheless, after reviewing the record, the RD is adopted. Accordingly, defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 102] is granted, and Dunahue’s excessive force and inadequate medical claims against defendants Kennie Bolden, John Rodgers, Brandon James, Lisa Childress, Brian Perkins, Randy Watson, Moses Jackson, Jeremy Andrews, Chris Budnik, and Marshall Reed are dismissed with prejudice. The claims against defendants Bruce Warren, Joseph Bivens, Mary Lloyd, Bruce McConnell, William Williams, and Jamarcus Davis, have already been dismissed without prejudice. Doc. No. 94. Therefore, having disposed of all claims against all defendants, this case is closed. IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of July 2017. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?