Dunahue v. Bolden et al
ORDER adopting the 90 partial recommended disposition; dismissing without prejudice Dunahue's claims against defendants Bruce Warren, Mary Lloyd, William Williams, Bruce McConnell, Jamarcus Davis, and Joseph Bivens; and denying Dunahue's 91 request for a hearing. Dunahue may proceed with his claim against all other defendants. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/5/2017. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00105 BSM
KENNIE BOLDEN, et al.
The partial recommended disposition (“PRD”) submitted by U.S. Magistrate Judge
J. Thomas Ray [Doc. No. 90] and plaintiff Reginald Dunahue’s objections [Doc. Nos. 91]
have been reviewed. After reviewing the record, the PRD is adopted.
Accordingly, Dunahue’s claims against defendants Bruce Warren, Mary Lloyd,
William Williams, Bruce McConnell, Jamarcus Davis, and Joseph Bivens are dismissed
without prejudice. Dunahue may proceed with his claims against all other defendants.
Dunahue’s request for a hearing [see Doc. No. 91 at 1] is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of January 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?