Dunahue v. Bolden et al
ORDER adopting 92 the partial recommended disposition; denying 88 plaintiff Reginald Dunahue's second motion for a preliminary injunction; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/24/2017. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00105 BSM
KENNIE BOLDEN, et al.
The partial recommended disposition (“PRD”) submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge J. Thomas Ray [Doc. No. 92] has been reviewed. No objections have been filed.
After reviewing the record, the PRD is adopted.
Accordingly, plaintiff Reginald Dunahue’s second motion for a preliminary injunction
[Doc. No. 88] is denied. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken
in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of January 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?