Dunahue v. Bolden et al

Filing 98

ORDER adopting 92 the partial recommended disposition; denying 88 plaintiff Reginald Dunahue's second motion for a preliminary injunction; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/24/2017. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
REGINALD DUNAHUE
ADC #106911
v.

PLAINTIFF

CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00105 BSM

KENNIE BOLDEN, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The partial recommended disposition (“PRD”) submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge J. Thomas Ray [Doc. No. 92] has been reviewed. No objections have been filed.
After reviewing the record, the PRD is adopted.
Accordingly, plaintiff Reginald Dunahue’s second motion for a preliminary injunction
[Doc. No. 88] is denied. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken
in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of January 2017.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE