Dunahue v. Bolden et al

Filing 98

ORDER adopting 92 the partial recommended disposition; denying 88 plaintiff Reginald Dunahue's second motion for a preliminary injunction; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 1/24/2017. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION REGINALD DUNAHUE ADC #106911 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00105 BSM KENNIE BOLDEN, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The partial recommended disposition (“PRD”) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray [Doc. No. 92] has been reviewed. No objections have been filed. After reviewing the record, the PRD is adopted. Accordingly, plaintiff Reginald Dunahue’s second motion for a preliminary injunction [Doc. No. 88] is denied. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of January 2017. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?