Ward v. Watson et al

Filing 34

ORDER adopting the 18 Recommendation, and overruling Ward's objections 24 . Ward may proceed with his court access and retaliation claims against Defendant Burl. Ward's claims against all other Defendants are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/7/2016. (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
TERRY LEE WARD
ADC #136026
v.

PLAINTIFF
No. 5:16-cv-110-DPM-PSH

RANDY WATSON, Warden, Varner Super
Maximum Unit, ADC; DANNY BURL, Warden,
Maximum Security Unit, ADC; C. BUDNIK,
Varner Super Maximum Unit; BOLDEN, Major,
Varner Supermax, ADC; STEPHENS, Inmate
Property Room Supervisor, Varner Supermax,
ADC; BROWN, Sergeant, Varner Supermax,
ADC; and DOES

DEFENDANTS

ORDER
On de nova review, the Court adopts the recommendation, NQ 18, and
overrulesWard'sobjections,NQ24. FED.R.CN.P.72(b)(3). Wardmayproceed
with his court access and retaliation claims against Defendant Burl. Ward's
claims against all other Defendants are dismissed without prejudice.
So Ordered.

{'

D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
7
i

. 10
Oc. ,L