Webb v. Lamb et al
Filing
7
ORDER Adopting 4 Recommended Disposition. Mr. Webb's complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal will count as a "strike" for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 12/11/2017. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
TRENTON WEBB,
ADC#155409
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 5:16-cv-00116 KGB/JTR
JAME LAMB, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is the Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) from United
States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray (Dkt. No. 4). Plaintiff Trenton Webb filed objections to
Judge Ray’s Recommendation (Dkt. No. 5). After review of Judge Ray’s Recommendation and
the timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, this Court adopts Judge Ray’s
Recommendation in its entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects (Dkt. No. 4).
It is therefore ordered that:
1.
Mr. Webb’s complaint is dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted (Dkt. No. 2).
2.
This dismissal will count as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
So ordered this 11th day of December, 2017.
______________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?