Capshaw v. Stieve et al
ORDER: The Court construes Capshaw's motion to amend, 8 , as an objection to the recommendation, 5 . On de novo review, the Court sustains the objection and adopts the recommendation as modified. Capshaw may proceed with his claims against Dr. Stieve. His claims against Griswold, Bland, and Capps should proceed past screening as well. His claims against all other Defendants are dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/3/2016. (jak)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?