Roberts v. Kelly et al

Filing 25

ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to prepare summons for Defendant Lamb through the Arkansas Department of Correction Compliance Division and directing the U.S. Marshal to serve copies of the 2 complaint, 24 amended complaint, with any attac hments, and a summons without prepayment of fees, costs, or security. Mr. Roberts's claims against Defendant Mitchell are dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk is instructed to terminate Defendant Mitchell as a party Defendant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Beth Deere on 7/28/2016. (mef)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION BRUNSON ROBERTS, ADC #127841 V. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:16-CV-138-DPM-BD WENDY KELLEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Mr. Roberts has now filed his amended complaint. (Docket entry #24) The allegations in the amended complaint state a constitutional claim against Defendant John Lamb. Accordingly, service is now proper for Defendant Lamb. The Clerk of Court is directed to prepare a summons for Defendant Lamb. The United States Marshal is directed to serve copies of the complaint, the amended complaint, with any attachments (#2, #24), and a summons for this Defendant without requiring prepayment of fees and costs or security. Service for Defendant Lamb should be through the Arkansas Department of Correction Compliance Division, P.O. Box 20550, Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71612. In addition, in his amended complaint, Mr. Roberts has moved to voluntarily dismiss his claims against Defendant Mitchell. For good cause, Mr. Roberts’s claims against Defendant Mitchell are DISMISSED, without prejudice. The Clerk is instructed to terminate Defendant Mitchell as a party Defendant. Mr. Roberts’s claims against the Arkansas Parole Board will be addressed in a separate order. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 28th day of July, 2016. _____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?