Fritts v. Kelley et al
Filing
45
ORDER adopting 40 Partial Recommendation. The 12 , 20 , and 35 motions to dismiss are granted in part and denied in part. Fritts's claims for damages against the Defendants in their official capacities are dismissed with prejudice. The case will go forward on all other claims. Fritts's 39 Motion is granted and the Clerk is directed to docket the motion as an addendum to Fritts's 19 Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/28/2017. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
BRANDON FRITTS
ADC # 120999
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 5:16-cv-141-DPM-PSH
WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas
Department of Correction; DALE REED,
Deputy Director, ADC; RANDY WATSON,
Warden, Varner/Varner Supermax;
DOES, VSM Director Review Committee,
VSM Classification Committee; FLORIA
WASHINGTON, Classification Officer,
Varner SuperMax; CURTIS MEINZER,
Deputy Warden, Varner SuperMax;
MOSES JACKSON, Deputy Warden,
Varner SuperMax; JEREMY ANDREWS,
Deputy Warden, Varner SuperMax; BILLY
INMAN, Deputy Warden, Varner SuperMax;
and CHRIS BUDNIK, Deputy Warden,
Varner SuperMax
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
A recent order mailed to Fritts came back undelivered. Ng 43. But
Magistrate Judge Harris's 31 January 2017 partial recommendation hasn't
been returned. The Court adopts that unopposed partial recommendation,
Ng 40.
FED.
R. Crv. P. 72(b) (1983 addition to advisory committee notes). The
motions to dismiss, Ng 12, 20 & 35, are granted in part and denied in part.
Fritts' s claims for damages against the Defendants in their official capacities
are dismissed with prejudice. The case will go forward on all other claims.
And Fritts's motion to amend, NQ 39, is granted. The Court directs the Clerk
to docket the motion, NQ 39, as an addendum to Fritts's amended complaint,
So Ordered.
D .P. Marshall Jr. 7/
United States District Judge
~ fJ feb-iv.M.y 'J-017
I
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?