Ellis v. Ludlum et al
Filing
23
ORDER denying 21 Motion. Ellis's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/29/2016. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JERRY J. ELLIS
ADC #78658
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 5:16-cv-157-DPM
S. LUDLUM, CCS, Dental Assistant;
J. STIEVE, CCS; B. GRAY, Former CCS
Employee; GRISWALD, CCS, Doctor;
C. HUBBARD, CCS, APN; E. BLAND, CCS,
APN; W. CLOWERS, Former CCS Employee, APN;
C. CAPPS, CCS, APN; A. KING, Former CCS
Employee; A. GRAY, CCS, LPN; C. Chisom, CCS,
Medical Staff; K. HARGRAVE, CCS, LPN; K. SNOW,
Former CCS Employee; ABLES, CCS, LPN; LEGGETT,
CCS, LPN; K. CLEARY, CEO, Clif Bar Company
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has given Ellis plenty of time to pay the filing fee, NQ 13 & 18.
Ellis has not done so. Based on lack of access to library materials, he asks for
more time to respond on the merits of whether he is a 3-striker. That motion,
N2 21, is denied. Ellis' s status is clear. He has filed many cases, at least four
of which satisfy the statutory criteria. See Judge Volpe' s Order, N2 13, which
the Court directs the Clerk to send Ellis again. There's been no showing that
Ellis satisfies the imminent-danger exception.
dismissed without prejudice.
The complaint will be
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr. (/
United States District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?