Clay v. Correct Care Solution et al

Filing 40

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL dismissing without prejudice Clay's claims against the Doe Defendant and certifying, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order of Partial Dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 1/13/2017. (mef)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION

BRIAN MORLANTHUS CLAY,
ADC #119898
V.

PLAINTIFF

5:16CV00160 SWW/JTR

CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, et al.

DEFENDANTS

ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL
Clay has not filed a motion for service identifying the Doe defendant, and the
time to do so has expired. Docs. 19 & 36. Accordingly, Clay's claims against the Doe
defendant are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
4(m). It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order of Partial Dismissal would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 13TH day of January, 2017.

/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

-1-