Clay v. Correct Care Solution et al
Filing
40
ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL dismissing without prejudice Clay's claims against the Doe Defendant and certifying, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order of Partial Dismissal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 1/13/2017. (mef)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
BRIAN MORLANTHUS CLAY,
ADC #119898
V.
PLAINTIFF
5:16CV00160 SWW/JTR
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL
Clay has not filed a motion for service identifying the Doe defendant, and the
time to do so has expired. Docs. 19 & 36. Accordingly, Clay's claims against the Doe
defendant are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
4(m). It is certified, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order of Partial Dismissal would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 13TH day of January, 2017.
/s/Susan Webber Wright
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?