Walker v. Payne et al
Filing
98
ORDER adopting 85 Partial Recommendation and overruling 92 Objections. CCS and Jones's 62 Motion for summary judgment is granted. Walker's claims against them are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Henderson and Cockrell's 75 Motion for summary judgment is denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/14/2018. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
ANDREW WALKER
ADC # 118512
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 5:16-cv-164-DPM-BD
MELANIE JONES, Doctor, CCS;
JOHN L. HENDERSON, Sergeant,
Wrightsville Unit, ADC; STEPHEN
M. COCKRELL, Sergeant, Wrightsville
Unit, ADC; and CORRECTIONAL
CARE SOLUTIONS, also known as CCS Inc.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
On de nova review, the Court adopts the partial recommendation,
NQ 85, and overrules Walker's objections, NQ 92. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3).
CCS and Jones' s motion for summary judgment, NQ 62, is granted.
Walker's claims against them are dismissed without prejudice for
failure to exhaust. Henderson and Cockrell' s motion for summary
judgment, NQ 75, is denied.
So Ordered.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
l'i
Nl~y
I
'J..018
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?