Walker v. Payne et al

Filing 98

ORDER adopting 85 Partial Recommendation and overruling 92 Objections. CCS and Jones's 62 Motion for summary judgment is granted. Walker's claims against them are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Henderson and Cockrell's 75 Motion for summary judgment is denied. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/14/2018. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ANDREW WALKER ADC # 118512 v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:16-cv-164-DPM-BD MELANIE JONES, Doctor, CCS; JOHN L. HENDERSON, Sergeant, Wrightsville Unit, ADC; STEPHEN M. COCKRELL, Sergeant, Wrightsville Unit, ADC; and CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS, also known as CCS Inc. DEFENDANTS ORDER On de nova review, the Court adopts the partial recommendation, NQ 85, and overrules Walker's objections, NQ 92. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b)(3). CCS and Jones' s motion for summary judgment, NQ 62, is granted. Walker's claims against them are dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust. Henderson and Cockrell' s motion for summary judgment, NQ 75, is denied. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge l'i Nl~y I 'J..018

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?