Humphrey v. White et al

Filing 59

ORDER adopting in their entirety 58 the proposed findings and recommendation ; granting 46 defendants' motion for summary judgment; dismissing, without prejudice, Humphrey's claims against defendants White and Hepler; dismissing, with prejudice, Humphrey's claims against the remaining defendant; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 3/6/2018. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ROKOSI HUMPHREY ADC #154914 v. PLAINTIFF CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00174 BSM NATHAN DAVID WHITE, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The proposed findings and recommendation [Doc. No. 58] submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful review of the record, the proposed findings and recommendation are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 46] is granted, Humphrey’s claims against defendants White and Hepler are dismissed without prejudice, and Humphrey’s claims against the remaining defendant are dismissed with prejudice. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order and accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 6th day of March 2018. _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?