Sanders v. Kelley et al
Filing
89
ORDER Adopting 88 Recommended Disposition. The 63 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Kenneth Bolden and Kristena Rosales-Calloway is granted, and Plaintiff's claims against both Defendants are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 2/27/2018. (mcz)
<![CDATA[
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
DANIEL SANDERS
ADC # 094279
VS.
PLAINTIFF
5:16-CV-00190-JM-JTR
KENNETH BOLDEN and
KRISTENA ROSALES-CALLOWAY
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The recommended disposition [Doc. No. 88] submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge J. Thomas Ray has been reviewed.
No objections were filed.
After careful
consideration, the recommended disposition is adopted in its entirety.
Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Kenneth
Bolden and Kristena Rosales-Calloway [Doc. No. 63] is granted, and Plaintiff Daniel
Sanders’ claims against both Defendants are dismissed with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 27th day of February, 2018.
_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
