Jones v. Burl et al
Filing
229
ORDER Adopting 228 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. Jones' 172 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. Defendants' 201 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted, and Jones' claims against them are dismissed with prejudice. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/3/2018. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
BENJAMIN MUHAMMAD JONES
v.
PLAINTIFF
No. 5:16-cv-00191 JM-PSH
DANNY BURL, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all
respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Jones’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 172) is DENIED.
2.
Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 201) is GRANTED, and
Jones’ claims against them are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
3.
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal taken from the order and
judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith.
DATED this 3rd day of January, 2018.
_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?