Jones v. Burl et al
Filing
94
ORDER ADOPTING 72 Proposed Findings and Partial Recommendations. Plaintiff Benjamin Muhammad Jones is allowed to proceed in this case only on his failure to protect claims against defendants Danny Burl, Ronald Watson, Sterling Kirk, Ruthie Jones, Xavier Cuclager, Dexter L. Payne, Gregory Newsom, and LaToya Johnson, and all of Jones' other claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 11/30/2016. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
BENJAMIN MUHAMMAD JONES
PLAINTIFF
ADC #89586
V.
NO: 5:16CV00191 JM/PSH
DANNY BURL et al
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition
submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris, and the objections filed. After
carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the
Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Partial Recommended Disposition should be, and
hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT plaintiff Benjamin Muhammad Jones is allowed to
proceed in this case only on his failure to protect claims against defendants Danny Burl, Ronald
Watson, Sterling Kirk, Ruthie Jones, Xavier Cuclager, Dexter L. Payne, Gregory Newsom, and
LaToya Johnson, and all of Jones’ other claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
DATED this 30th day of November, 2016.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?