Chestang v. Allen et al

Filing 14

ORDER adopting 8 Recommendation as modified and overrules most of Chestang's objections. Chestang's 5 Motion for service is denied. His complaint will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28U.S.C.§1915(g). An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 12/14/2016. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION KeONDRA M. CHESTANG ADC#134005 v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:16-cv-224-DPM V. ALLEN, Mailroom, Varner Unit; BROWN, Sergeant, Varner Unit; ANDREWS, Assistant Warden of Treatment, Varner Unit; JAMES PLUMMER, Varner Unit; BARBARA SMALLWOOD, Business ManagerjMailroom Supervisor Aide, Varner Unit; DUNCAN, Sergeant, Varner Unit; and WRIGHT, Wrightsville Unit DEFENDANTS ORDER 1. On de nova review, the Court adopts the recommendation, NQ 8, as modified and overrules most of Chestang' s objections, NQ 11-12. FED. R. CN. P. 72(b)(3). 2. The modifications: First, inadvertent opening of a prisoner's legal mail may sometimes support a§ 1983 claim. Compare NQ 8 at 5-6 with Beaulieu v. Ludeman, 690 F.3d 1017, 1037 (8th Cir. 2012). But the Magistrate Judge's conclusion holds because Chestang hasn't alleged any prejudice from the inadvertent opening of his mail. Ibid. Second, Chestang believes he's stated a solid Eighth Amendment claim. NQ 11at3 & NQ 6-1at7. He hasn't. The facts in his complaint don't rise to the level of cruel and unusual punishment. Phillips v. Norris, 320 F.3d 844, 848 (8th Cir. 2003). 3. Chestang' s motion for service, NQ 5, is denied. His complaint will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim. This dismissal counts as a "strike" for purposes of 28U.S.C.§1915(g). An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). So Ordered. ,ii D.P. Marshall Jr'. United State District Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?