Richardson v. Kelley et al
ORDER adopting 96 the proposed findings and recommendation; dismissing, with prejudice, Richardson's complaint; denying 81 his motion for summary judgment; granting 87 defendants' motion for summary judgment; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/14/2018. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:16-CV-00245 BSM
JASON KELLEY and ESTELLA BLAND
The proposed findings and recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge Patricia S. Harris [Doc. No. 96] and plaintiff Every Richardson’s objections [Doc. No.
97] have been reviewed. After de novo review of the record, the proposed findings and
recommendation are adopted in their entirety. Accordingly, Richardson’s complaint is
dismissed with prejudice, his motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 81] is denied,
defendants’ motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 87] is granted, and the case is
dismissed with prejudice. It is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from this order
would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 14th day of February 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?