Hill v. Kelley

Filing 11

ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety the 7 Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; granting Hill's 6 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; denying as moot Hill's 3 and 5 motions to cor rect; dismissing without prejudice Hill's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus 1 so that Hill may seek authorization from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals to file a successive habeas petition; and denying a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 9/28/2016. (ljb)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JESSIE HILL, ADC #104136 v. PETITIONER NO. 5:16CV00258-JLH-JTR WENDY KELLEY, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has reviewed the Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. Judgment will be entered accordingly. IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED THAT: 1. Hill’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Document #6. 2. Hill’s motions to correct are DENIED as moot. Documents #3 and #5. 3. Hill’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, so that Hill may seek authorization from the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(A), to file a successive habeas petition. Document #1. 4. A certificate of appealability is DENIED, see 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)-(2); Rule 11(a), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in United States District Courts. DATED this 28th day of September, 2016. _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?