Plessy v. Griffin et al

Filing 65

ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety the 45 Recommendation as this Court's findings in all respects; granting 35 Motion for Summary Judgment as to Griffin and denying as to Watson and Wendy Kelley; granting 38 Motion for Summary J udgment as to Dr. Stieve and denying as to Jason Kelley; denying Plessy's 45 Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment; and dismissing without prejudice Plessy's claims against Griffin and Dr. Stieve. Plessy may proceed with his inhumane working condition claim against Watson, Wendy Kelley, Jason Kelley, and Bland. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 5/22/2017. (ljb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION QUINCY JAY PLESSY, ADC #149962 V. PLAINTIFF 5:16CV00276 JM/JTR RORY GRIFFIN, Deputy Director of Health and Correctional Programs, ADC, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Griffin, Watson, and Wendy Kelley's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 35) is GRANTED as to Griffin and DENIED as to Watson and Wendy Kelley. 2. Dr. Stieve and Jason Kelley's' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 38) is GRANTED as to Dr. Stieve and DENIED as to Jason Kelley. 3. Plessy's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 45) is denied. 4. Plessy's claims against Griffin and Dr. Stieve are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 5. Plessy may proceed with his inhumane working condition claim against Watson, Wendy Kelley, Jason Kelley, and Bland. Dated this 22nd day of May, 2017. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?