Smith et al v. General Motors Company et al

Filing 42

ORDER: The Smith's have not responded to the Court's August and September Order requesting more information to clarify service on the sole remaining defendant, General Motors, 40 & 41 . If the Smith's do not respond by 10/27/2017, the Court will dismiss this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/29/2017. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION MAEOLA SMITH & DONNELL SMITH v. PLAINTIFFS No. 5:16-cv-283-DPM DEFENDANT GENERAL MOTORS CO. ORDER The Smiths have not responded to the Court's August and September Orders requesting more information to clarify service on the sole remaining defendant, General Motors. NQ 40 & NQ 41. If the Smiths do not respond by 27 October 2017, the Court will dismiss this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute. So Ordered. D .P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?