Young v. Clark et al

Filing 6

ORDER adopting 4 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; dismissing Plaintiff's 2 Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; finding that dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/05/2016. (rhm)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JOHNNY L. YOUNG, JR.
V.

PLAINTIFF
5:16CV00286-JM-JTK

TASHA CLARK, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and
recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the
record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.

Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendant is DISMISSED, for failure to state a claim

upon which relief may be granted.
2.

Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison

Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
3.

The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and

accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of October, 2016.

______________________________________
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1