Young v. Clark et al
ORDER adopting 4 proposed findings and recommendations in their entirety; dismissing Plaintiff's 2 Complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; finding that dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 10/05/2016. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JOHNNY L. YOUNG, JR.
TASHA CLARK, et al.
The Court has received proposed findings and recommendations from United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney. After a review of those proposed findings and
recommendations, and the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the
record, the Court adopts them in their entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s Complaint against Defendant is DISMISSED, for failure to state a claim
upon which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of this action constitutes a “strike” within the meaning of the Prison
Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and
accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
An appropriate Judgment shall accompany this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 5th day of October, 2016.
JAMES M. MOODY, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?