Watts v. Administrative Office of the Courts et al

Filing 23

ORDER adopting 19 the Partial Recommended Disposition; and dismissing without prejudice Ms. Watts's claims against the AOC and Doe Defendants. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 4/9/2018. (kdr)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION RUBY J. WATTS V. PETITIONER CASE NO. 5:16-CV-302-JM-BD ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES OF THE COURTS, et al. RESPONDENT ORDER The Court has received a Partial Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) from Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation, Ms. Watts’s timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects. Even using the 120 day time limit for obtaining service as argued by Plaintiff in her objections, she still has not identified the John Doe Defendant(s) or obtained service on the Administrative Office of the Courts. Ms. Watts’s claims against the AOC and Doe Defendants are DISMISSED, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 9th day of April, 2018. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?