Watts v. Administrative Office of the Courts et al

Filing 23

ORDER adopting 19 the Partial Recommended Disposition; and dismissing without prejudice Ms. Watts's claims against the AOC and Doe Defendants. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 4/9/2018. (kdr)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
RUBY J. WATTS
V.

PETITIONER
CASE NO. 5:16-CV-302-JM-BD

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
OF THE COURTS, et al.

RESPONDENT
ORDER

The Court has received a Partial Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”)
from Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommendation, Ms.
Watts’s timely objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes
that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s
findings in all respects. Even using the 120 day time limit for obtaining service as argued
by Plaintiff in her objections, she still has not identified the John Doe Defendant(s) or
obtained service on the Administrative Office of the Courts.
Ms. Watts’s claims against the AOC and Doe Defendants are DISMISSED,
without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 9th day of April, 2018.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE