Halfacre v. Correct Care Solutions et al
Filing
61
ORDER adopting 57 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. 47 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. 53 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants CCS are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's 2 cause of action is dismissed. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/21/2017. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
KENNY HALFACRE
ADC #84410
v.
PLAINTIFF
5:16CV00313-JLH
CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS; et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff=s Objections.
After carefully
considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that
the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and
adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that:
1.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 47) is DENIED.
2.
Defendant CCS’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 53) is
GRANTED.
3.
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant CCS are DISMISSED with prejudice.
4.
Plaintiff’s cause of action (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED.
5.
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations would not be taken in good faith.
DATED this 21st day of August, 2017.
_______________________________________
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?