Halfacre v. Correct Care Solutions et al

Filing 61

ORDER adopting 57 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition. 47 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. 53 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. Plaintiff's claims against Defendants CCS are dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff's 2 cause of action is dismissed. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/21/2017. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION KENNY HALFACRE ADC #84410 v. PLAINTIFF 5:16CV00313-JLH CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS; et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff=s Objections. After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 47) is DENIED. 2. Defendant CCS’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 53) is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant CCS are DISMISSED with prejudice. 4. Plaintiff’s cause of action (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED. 5. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order adopting the recommendations would not be taken in good faith. DATED this 21st day of August, 2017. _______________________________________ J. LEON HOLMES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?