Doshier v. Dallas County Detention Facility et al
Filing
13
ORDER approving and adopting the 5 Proposed Findings and Recommendation as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing with prejudice Mr. Doshier's claims against the Dallas County Detention Facility; and denying as moot Mr. Doshie r's request to amend his complaint to bring claims against separate defendants Stringfellow and Parnell. Mr. Doshier has, for screening purposes, stated a claim for relief against defendants Stringfellow and Parnell that will proceed. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/27/2017. (mef)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
TERRY JOE DOSHIER
REG #27524-009
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 5:16-cv-00315 KGB-PSH
DALLAS COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY; et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris and the objections filed by plaintiff Terry Joe Doshier
(Dkt. Nos. 5; 11). 1 After carefully considering the objections and making a de novo review of the
record in this case, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendation should
be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court's findings in all respects
(Dkt. No. 5).
It is therefore ordered that Mr. Doshier’s claims against the Dallas County Detention
Facility are dismissed with prejudice. Mr. Doshier’s request to amend his complaint to bring
claims against separate defendants Stringfellow and Parnell, which Mr. Doshier included in his
objections, is denied as moot. Mr. Doshier included claims against these defendants in his original
complaint. Mr. Doshier has, for screening purposes, stated a claim for relief against defendants
Stringfellow and Parnell that will proceed.
So ordered this 27th day of June, 2017.
____________________________________
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
1
Plaintiff Terry Joe Doshier’s objections were untimely filed (Dkt. No. 11). However,
the Court considered Mr. Doshier’s objections and conducted a de novo review of the record in
this case.
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
