Williams v. Burl et al

Filing 11

ORDER Adopting 7 Recommended Disposition. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Dismissal is a "strike," as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 1/17/2017. (mcz)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION RODNEY WILLIAMS, ADC #79899 V. PLAINTIFF 5:16CV00320 JM/JTR DANNY BURL, Warden, Tucker Max Unit, ADC, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray and the objections. After carefully considering these documents and making a de novo review of the record in this case, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. This case is dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. 2. Dismissal is a "strike," as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 3. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. Dated this 17th day of January, 2017. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?