Tarkington v. Burl et al
Filing
16
ORDER adopting the 5 partial recommended disposition. Accordingly, Tarkington's claims against defendant Kirk Sterling for filing a false disciplinary report; defendant James Carton for not allowing video footage at his disciplinary hearing; and defendant Wendy Kelley for the failure-to-train and the failure-to-supervise are all dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/23/2016. (rhm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JOHNNY TARKINGTON
ADC #85550
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO: 5:16-CV-00324 BSM
DANNY BURL, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The partial recommended disposition (“PRD”) submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge Beth Deere [Doc. No. 5] has been reviewed. Plaintiff Johnny Tarkington filed
objections [Doc. No. 15], though his filing focuses on defendants’ unrelated motion to
dismiss [Doc. No. 13] rather than the PRD. After reviewing the record, including the
relevant portions of Tarkington’s objections, the PRD is adopted.
Accordingly, Tarkington’s claims against defendant Kirk Sterling for filing a false
disciplinary report; defendant James Carlton for not allowing video footage at his disciplinary
hearing; and defendant Wendy Kelley for the failure-to-train and the failure-to-supervise are
all dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 23rd day of November 2016.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?