Whitney v. Kelly et al
ORDER adopting the 36 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety and denying 2 Mr. Whitney's motion for "Ex Parte Injunction" which the Court construes as a motion for preliminary injunction. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/27/2017. (mef)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JAMES E. WHITNEY
Case No. 5:16-cv-00353 KGB/JTK
WENDY KELLEY, et al.
The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 36). Plaintiff James E. Whitney filed
objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations, but his objections were untimely filed
(Dkt. No. 43). However, even if the Court treated Mr. Whitney’s objections as timely filed, after
a review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations and Mr. Whitney’s objections, as well
as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations
in their entirety (Dkt. No. 36). Therefore, Mr. Whitney’s motion for “Ex Parte Injunction,” which
the Court construes as a motion for preliminary injunction, is denied (Dkt. No. 2).
It is so ordered this 27th day of June, 2017.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?