Whitney v. Kelly et al

Filing 145

ORDER Adopting 116 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Mr. Whitney's 97 Motion for ex parte injunctive relief, which the court construes as a motion for preliminary injunction, is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/31/2017. (mcz)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JAMES E. WHITNEY ADC #163817 v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:16-cv-00353 KGB/JTK WENDY KELLEY, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 116). Plaintiff James E. Whitney filed objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 120). After a review of the Proposed Findings and Recommendations and Mr. Whitney’s objections, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety (Dkt. No. 116). It is therefore ordered that Mr. Whitney’s petition for ex parte injunctive relief, which the Court construes as a motion for preliminary injunction, is denied (Dkt. No. 97). It is so ordered this 31st day of August, 2017. __________________________________ Kristine G. Baker United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?