Whitney v. Kelly et al
ORDER Adopting 116 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. Mr. Whitney's 97 Motion for ex parte injunctive relief, which the court construes as a motion for preliminary injunction, is denied. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/31/2017. (mcz)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JAMES E. WHITNEY
Case No. 5:16-cv-00353 KGB/JTK
WENDY KELLEY, et al.
The Court has received Proposed Findings and Recommendations submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 116). Plaintiff James E. Whitney filed
objections to the Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Dkt. No. 120). After a review of the
Proposed Findings and Recommendations and Mr. Whitney’s objections, as well as a de novo
review of the record, the Court adopts the Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their
entirety (Dkt. No. 116). It is therefore ordered that Mr. Whitney’s petition for ex parte injunctive
relief, which the Court construes as a motion for preliminary injunction, is denied (Dkt.
It is so ordered this 31st day of August, 2017.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?