Lang v. Hampton et al

Filing 48

ORDER granting 47 Motion for extension of time. Ms. Lang has up to and including 5/28/2018 to respond to the pending motions for summary judgment. Defendants' reply briefs due 7 days after the filing Ms. Lang's combined response. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 5/23/2018. (jak)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JODI LANG v. PLAINTIFF Case No. 5:17-cv-00002-KGB CLINTON HAMPTON, ROWENA COPICO, and LUCAN HARGRAVES DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is plaintiff Jodi Lang’s motion for extension of time to file response to motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 47). Ms. Lang represents that she currently has two responses due to the separate motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Clinton Hampton and Lucan Hargraves (Dkt. No. 38) and defendant Rowena Copico (Dkt. No. 41). She represents that the issues raised in these motions “overlap to a great degree,” and therefore, she requests permission to respond to both motions in a combined response (Dkt. No. 47, ¶ 1). She requests an extension until May 28, 2018, to file her combined response to the defendants’ pending motions for summary judgment. She further represents that defendants have no objection to this request. For good cause shown, the Court grants the motion (Id.). Ms. Lang has up to and including May 28, 2018, to respond to the pending motions for summary judgment. Defendants’ reply briefs will be due seven days after the filing of Ms. Lang’s combined response. It is so ordered this the 23rd day of May, 2018. ________________________________ KRISTINE G. BAKER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?