Lang v. Hampton et al
Filing
48
ORDER granting 47 Motion for extension of time. Ms. Lang has up to and including 5/28/2018 to respond to the pending motions for summary judgment. Defendants' reply briefs due 7 days after the filing Ms. Lang's combined response. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 5/23/2018. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JODI LANG
v.
PLAINTIFF
Case No. 5:17-cv-00002-KGB
CLINTON HAMPTON,
ROWENA COPICO, and
LUCAN HARGRAVES
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Before the Court is plaintiff Jodi Lang’s motion for extension of time to file response to
motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 47). Ms. Lang represents that she currently has two
responses due to the separate motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Clinton Hampton
and Lucan Hargraves (Dkt. No. 38) and defendant Rowena Copico (Dkt. No. 41). She represents
that the issues raised in these motions “overlap to a great degree,” and therefore, she requests
permission to respond to both motions in a combined response (Dkt. No. 47, ¶ 1). She requests an
extension until May 28, 2018, to file her combined response to the defendants’ pending motions
for summary judgment. She further represents that defendants have no objection to this request.
For good cause shown, the Court grants the motion (Id.). Ms. Lang has up to and including
May 28, 2018, to respond to the pending motions for summary judgment. Defendants’ reply briefs
will be due seven days after the filing of Ms. Lang’s combined response.
It is so ordered this the 23rd day of May, 2018.
________________________________
KRISTINE G. BAKER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?