Radford v. Brooks et al

Filing 43

ORDER adopting 26 Partial Recommended Disposition in all respects. Mr. Radford may proceed on his failure-to-protect claims against Defendants Earl, Bradley, Burl, Clark, Brooks, Clorid, Gaines, Stout, Montgomery, and Byrd. His deliberate indiff erence claims against Defendants Earl and Bradley, his retaliation claims against Souther and Mitchum, his excessive force claim against Mitchum, his deliberate indifference claims against Brooks and Wooten, his claim that he has not received adequate dental care since his transfer to the MSU, and his claim against Defendant Spears are dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 4/17/2017. (mcz)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
TOMMY RADFORD
ADC #89900
V.

PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 5:17-CV-00006 JM/BD

V. BROOKS, et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

The Court has received a Partial Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”)
from Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. The parties have not filed objections. After careful
review of the Recommendation, the Court concludes that the Recommendation should be,
and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all respects.
Mr. Radford may proceed on his failure-to-protect claims against Defendants Earl,
Bradley, Burl, Clark, Brooks, Clorid, Gaines, Stout, Montgomery, and Byrd. His
deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Earl and Bradley, his retaliation claims
against Defendant Souther and Defendant Mitchum, his excessive force claim against
Defendant Mitchum, his deliberate indifference claims against Defendants Brooks and
Wooten, his claim that he has not received adequate dental care since his transfer to the
MSU, and his claim against Defendant Spears are DISMISSED, without prejudice.
The Clerk is instructed to terminate Defendants Wooten, Johnson, Nunn, Mitchum,
and Spears as party Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED, this 17th day of April, 2017.

________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2