Radford v. Brooks et al
ORDER Adopting 70 Recommended Disposition. The Defendants' 39 and 56 Motions for Summary Judgment are granted. Mr. Radford's claims are dismissed, without prejudice, based on his failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. His pending 44 Motion for preliminary injunctive relief is denied. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 6/7/2017. (mcz)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:17-CV-00006 JM/BD
V. BROOKS, et al.
The Court has received a Recommended Disposition (“Recommendation”) from
Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful consideration of the Recommendation and
Mr. Radford’s timely objections, and after a de novo review of the record, the Court
concludes that the Recommendation should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as
this Court’s findings in all respects.
The Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (docket entries #39, #56) are
GRANTED. Mr. Radford’s claims are DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on his
failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. His pending motion for preliminary
injunctive relief (#44) is DENIED, as moot
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 7th day of June, 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?