Green v. Griffin et al
Filing
43
ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety the 41 Recommendation as this Court's findings in all respects; granting Defendants' 29 Motion to Revoke Green's In Forma Pauperis, and dismissing this case without prejudice; dismissing without prejudice Wilson's 22 Motion to Dismiss and Rory's 35 Motion for Summary Judgment, and they may refile those Motions if Green reopens this case; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Green has 30 days from the entry of this Order to reopen this case by paying the $400 filing fee in full and filing a Motion to Reopen. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 6/28/2017. (ljb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
MICHAEL RAY GREEN,
ADC #82316
V.
PLAINTIFF
5:17CV0007 JM/JTR
RORY GRIFFIN,
ADC Health Director, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge
J. Thomas Ray and the filed objections. After carefully considering these documents and making
a de novo review of the record in this case, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its
entirety as this Court's findings in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
1.
Defendants' Motion to Revoke Green's In Form Pauperis (Doc. 29) is granted, and
this case is dismissed without prejudice.
2.
Green has thirty days from the entry of this Order to reopen this case by paying
the $400 filing fee in full and filing a Motion to Reopen.
3.
Wilson's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 22) and Rory's Motion for Summary Judgment
(Doc. 35) are dismissed without prejudice, and they may refile those Motions if Green reopens this
case.
4.
It is CERTIFIED, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith.
Dated this 28th day of June, 2017.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?