Holloway v. Stant USA Corp et al
ORDER granting 12 Motion to reconsider. The complaint will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 9/12/2017. (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
STANT USA CORP., and
The circumstances are unique.
Holloway made many claims
against Stant, among them a FLSA retaliatory-firing claim.
discovery, Holloway acknowledged that she had no solid evidence
supporting this claim, and thus abandoned it. NQ 12-1at2-3. She made
no claim for overtime or unpaid wages under either federal or state law.
Now Holloway and Stant propose to settle the case. Must the Court
evaluate the deal, as it would in the usual FLSA case involving wage
and overtime claims? No. In this unusual weave of circumstances, the
Court doesn't have to be involved. Holloway's FLSA claim, which
seems to have been no more than zealous pleading that covered all
potential claims, dropped out of the case approximately three months
The complaint will be dismissed with prejudice.
reconsider, NQ 12, granted.
D.P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?