Murrieta v. Andrews et al
ORDER adopting in its entirety 22 the recommended disposition; directing the clerk to amend the docket to reflect the full names of defendants Jeremy Andrews and Lacamra Watson; granting 19 Defendants' motion for summary judgment and dismissing with prejudice 2 Murietta's complaint; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from the order and judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 11/20/2017. (kdr)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:17-CV-00029 BSM
ANDREWS, Warden, et al.
The recommended disposition [Doc. No. 22] submitted by United States Magistrate
Judge Joe J. Volpe has been received. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the recommended disposition is hereby adopted in its entirety. Accordingly,
the clerk is directed to amend the docket to reflect the full names of defendants Jeremy
Andrews and Lacamra Watson. Defendants motion for summary judgment [Doc. No. 19]
is granted and Murietta’s complaint [Doc. No. 2] is dismissed with prejudice. Furthermore,
it is certified that an in forma pauperis appeal from the order and judgment would not be
taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of November 2017.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?