Whitmore v. Taylor et al

Filing 8

ORDER adopting 7 the Recommendation in its entirety; allowing Whitmore to proceed with his failure to protect claims against Taylor and Bolin, in their individual capacities only; directing the Clerk to prepare a summons for Taylor and Bolin; direc ting the USMS to serve the summons, complaint, amended complaint, and this Order on them without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore; and dismissing without prejudice, Whitmore's official capacity claims against Taylor and Bolin. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 5/19/2017. (kdr) (Docket text modified on 5/19/2017 to correct a typographical error).(jak)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION ALVONTAE WHITMORE V. PLAINTIFF 5:17CV00073 JM/JTR TAYLOR, Corporal; and GREG BOLIN, Chief/Head Administrator, Brassell Detention Center DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Recommendation submitted by United States Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray. No objections have been filed. After careful review, the Recommendation is approved and adopted in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. Whitmore may PROCEED with his failure to protect claims against Taylor and Bolin, in their individual capacities only. 2. The Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for Taylor and Bolin. The U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, complaint, amended complaint, and this Order on them without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. If either of the defendants are no longer Jefferson County employees, the individual responding to service must file a sealed statement providing the unserved defendant's last known private mailing address. 3. Whitmore's official capacity claims against Taylor and Bolin are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Dated this 19th day of May, 2017. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?