Page v. Bland et al

Filing 6

ORDER 4 adopting the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition; dismissing 2 Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; dismissal of this action counts as a "strike" f or purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 4/19/2017. (kdr) (Docket text modified on 4/19/2017 to correct a typographical error). (jak)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
DAVID PAGE
ADC #143815
VS.

PLAINTIFF

5:17CV00096-BRW

BLAND, APN, Tucker Max; et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s objections. After carefully considering the
objections and making a de novo review of the record, I approve and adopt the Proposed Findings
and Recommended Disposition in their entirety.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
I certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this
Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of April, 2017.

/s/ Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1