Page v. Bland et al
Filing
6
ORDER 4 adopting the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition; dismissing 2 Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; dismissal of this action counts as a "strike" f or purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 4/19/2017. (kdr) (Docket text modified on 4/19/2017 to correct a typographical error). (jak)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
DAVID PAGE
ADC #143815
VS.
PLAINTIFF
5:17CV00096-BRW
BLAND, APN, Tucker Max; et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by United
States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe and Plaintiff’s objections. After carefully considering the
objections and making a de novo review of the record, I approve and adopt the Proposed Findings
and Recommended Disposition in their entirety.
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. No. 2) is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to
state a claim upon which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
I certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this
Order and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 19th day of April, 2017.
/s/ Billy Roy Wilson
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?