Robinson v. Darton et al
Filing
15
ORDER adopting with modification 8 the partial recommended disposition. The recommendation to allow Robinson to proceed on his deliberate-indifference claim against defendant Warton is rejected because Warton was included in error. Robinson, howe ver, is allowed to proceed on his: (1) excessive-force claims against defendants Claudia Harris, Ronald Darton, and Walker, (2) failure-to-protect claims against defendants Spencer, Tonda L. Spencer, and Washington, (3) deliberate-indifference claim against defendant Darton, (4) retaliation claims against defendants Harris and Stevenson, and (5) failure-to-train claims against defendants Kelley and Dexter. The rest of Robinson's claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 6/21/2017. (kdr)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
CHRISTOPHER BLAIR DESHAUN ROBINSON,
ADC #152571
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 5:17CV00099 BSM
RONALD DARTON, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The partial recommended disposition [Doc. No. 10] submitted by United States
Magistrate Judge Beth Deere and the objections [Doc. No. 9] filed by plaintiff Christopher
Robinson have been reviewed. After careful consideration, the partial recommended
disposition is hereby adopted with a modification. The recommendation to allow Robinson
to proceed on his deliberate-indifference claim against defendant Warton is rejected because
Warton was included in error. Robinson, however, is allowed to proceed on his: (1)
excessive-force claims against defendants Claudia Harris, Ronald Darton, and Walker, (2)
failure-to-protect claims against defendants Spencer, Tonda L. Spencer, and Washington, (3)
deliberate-indifference claim against defendant Darton, (4) retaliation claims against
defendants Harris and Stevenson, and (5) failure-to-train claims against defendants Kelley
and Dexter. The rest of Robinson’s claims are dismissed without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of June 2017.
________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
