Robinson v. Brooks et al
ORDER approving and adopting in their entirety the 8 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing without prejudice Robinson's claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief ma y be granted; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from the order adopting this recommendation or the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith. Dismissal of this action counts as a "strike" within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 8/15/2017. (ljb)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
NO: 5:17CV00101 JLH/PSH
W. BROOKS, et al.
The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted
by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition
should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:
Robinson’s claims are dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon
which relief may be granted.
Dismissal of this action counts as a “strike” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. §
The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis
appeal from the order adopting this recommendation or the accompanying judgment would not be
taken in good faith.
DATED this 15th day of August, 2017.
J. LEON HOLMES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?