Radford v. Brooks et al

Filing 67

ORDER approving and adopting 66 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in all respects; directing the Clerk of the Court to amend the docket to reflect the full and correct names of Jasmine Saih and Leona Mosby; dismissing without prejudice any claims against Defendants Saih and Mosby that are outside the scope of the six exhausted grievances; granting 62 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment; dismissing this case; dismissing with prejudice Plaintiff's claims against Defendants Brooks, Johnson, Wooten, Whitmore, Saih, and Mosby; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 2/7/2018. (cmn)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
TOMMY RADFORD
ADC #89900
VS.

PLAINTIFF

5:17CV00116-BRW

VIVIAN BROOKS, LPN,
Tucker Maximum Security Unit; et al.

DEFENDANTS
ORDER

I have reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition submitted by
United States Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe. No objections have been filed. After careful
consideration, I approve and adopt the Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition in all
respects.
Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is directed to amend the docket to reflect the full and
correct names of Jasmine Saih and Leona Mosby.
Any claims against Defendants Saih and Mosby that are outside the scope of the six
exhausted grievances are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 62) is GRANTED, and this case
is DISMISSED.
Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Brooks, Johnson, Wooten, Whitmore, Saih, and
Mosby are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
I certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from this
Order adopting the recommendations and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in
good faith.
IT SO ORDERED this 7th day of February, 2018.

/s/ Billy Roy Wilson ______________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE