Boman v. Hubard et al
Filing
30
ORDER adopting in its entirety the 9 partial recommended disposition; and dismissing, without prejudice, Boman's claims against defendants Hurst, Jordan, and Kelley. Signed by Chief Judge Brian S. Miller on 10/20/2017. (ljb)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
JAMES EDWARD BOMAN
ADC #651206
v.
PLAINTIFF
CASE NO. 5:17-CV-00146 BSM
CONNIE HUBBARD, et al.
DEFENDANTS
ORDER
The partial recommended disposition submitted by United States Magistrate Judge
Beth Deere [Doc. No. 9] and plaintiff James Boman’s timely objections [Doc. No. 11] have
been reviewed. After de novo review of the record, the partial recommended disposition is
adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, Boman’s claims against defendants Hurst, Jordan, and
Kelley are dismissed, without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of October 2017.
_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
