Ashford v. Burl et al
ORDER approving and adopting the 3 Proposed Findings and Recommendations as this Court's findings in all respects; denying 1 Mr. Ashford's motion to proceed in forma pauperis; and dismissing without prejudice Mr. Ashford's complaint. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/31/2017. (mef)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
PINE BLUFF DIVISION
Case No. 5:17-cv-159 KGB/JTK
BURL, et al.
Before the Court are the Proposed Findings and Recommendations issued by United States
Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney (Dkt. No. 3). Plaintiff Charles Ashford has not filed an
objection to these Proposed Findings and Recommendations, and the time for filing an objection
has passed. For the reasons set forth in the Proposed Findings and Recommendations (Dkt. No.
3), Judge Kearney recommends that this Court deny Mr. Ashford’s motion to proceed in forma
pauperis (Dkt. No. 1). After careful review, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and
Recommendations should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted as this Court’s findings in all
respects (Dkt. No. 3).
The Court denies Mr. Ashford’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 1).
Consequently, the Court dismisses without prejudice Mr. Ashford’s complaint (Dkt. No. 2).
Should Mr. Ashford wish to continue prosecuting this case, he must submit the statutory filing fee
of $350 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number within ten days of the date of entry
of this Order, along with a motion to reopen the case. Only upon timely receipt of the motion and
full payment would this case be reopened.
It is so ordered this the 31st day of July, 2017.
Kristine G. Baker
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?