Kennedy v. Correct Care Solutions et al

Filing 7

ORDER Adopting 4 Proposed Findings and Recommendation. Motion 1 to Proceed in forma pauperis, denied. Motions 3 and 5 for Preliminary Injunction are denied. Kennedy's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. If he wants to pro ceed with this case, then he must pay the $400 filing and docketing fees and file a motion to reopen by 8/17/2017. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/17/2017. (mcz)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS PINE BLUFF DIVISION JEREMY KENNEDY ADC #093061 v. PLAINTIFF No. 5:17-cv-168-DPM CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS; AMANDA KING, Infirmary Supervisor, Pine Bluff Unit; and RORY GRIFFEN, Deputy Director, ADC DEFENDANTS ORDER On de nova review, the Court adopts the recornrnendation, Ng 4, and overrules Kennedy's objections, NQ 6. FED. R. Crv. P. 72(b)(3). Motion to proceed IFP, Ng 1, denied. Motions for preliminary injunction, Ng 3 & 5, denied. Kennedy's com.plaint will be dismissed without prejudice. If he wants to proceed with this case, then he must pay the $400 filing and docketing fees and file a motion to reopen by 17 August 2017. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3). So Ordered. D .P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge /7 ?11 ;1.0/7

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?